<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NativeHQ &#187; Audio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nativehq.com/index.php/category/audio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nativehq.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 21:18:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The invisible workload of social media</title>
		<link>http://nativehq.com/index.php/2010/02/the-invisible-workload-of-social-media/</link>
		<comments>http://nativehq.com/index.php/2010/02/the-invisible-workload-of-social-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Beardshaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social network services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web presence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nativehq.com/?p=475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently I&#8217;ve noticed how organisations who are starting to use social media are radically underestimating the time investment that such work requires&#8230; and often adding this work onto the job description of people who are already pretty busy. This is a bit of a mistake &#8211; it&#8217;s important to work out exactly what is involved [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently I&#8217;ve noticed how organisations who are starting to use social media are radically underestimating the time investment that such work requires&#8230; and often adding this work onto the job description of people who are already pretty busy. This is a bit of a mistake &#8211; it&#8217;s important to work out exactly what is involved in generating and getting content out successfully into the web community and to your followers.</p>
<p>Talking recently to a photographer, I was struck by how he described his clients&#8217; lack of understanding about what it took to properly publish his work online so that people saw it. Usually basing their own assumptions on their (limited) use of Facebook to share photos, they see it as an easy thing, which doesn&#8217;t require much time of special knowledge.</p>
<p>For a modern photographer, taking the photo is just the start of things&#8230; then comes processing of RAW files, then into Photoshop for some finishing touches to the post production process. Then resizing the image files and getting the colours right for print or web, depending on their use.</p>
<p>Over to Flickr, there&#8217;s uploading and creating (good) titles, descriptions, tags, geo-tags and other meta-data. Then there&#8217;s the option of doing a bit of research on Flickr to find appropriate groups to put the photos on. Then beyond Flickr, there are the other online places you might want to embed or publicise the content. Facebook, Twitter, client&#8217;s websites, niche networks etc.</p>
<p>Only then can he really consider his job &#8216;done&#8217;&#8230; and it takes at least as long as he used to spend in the dark room in the old days of film, when clients could appreciate that it took a good deal of time, art and experience to create a photographic object.</p>
<p>The same is true of text content (edits, re-edits, checking sources, writing for web and search, adding metadata, double checking, publishing,  pushing the content out to other networks etc). And the same with video &#8211; shooting, editing, captioning, converting into the right format, uploading (sometimes to multiple sites), embedding, publicising on other networks etc&#8230;</p>
<p>Often, a brand is also running a presence on Facebook &#8211; which needs its own attention, then there&#8217;s responding to incoming communications, monitoring online activity etc. All in all, it can be time consuming if you&#8217;re planning to attend to your online activity meaningfully.</p>
<p>So when we&#8217;re talking to companies who are looking at working seriously in the real time web environment, we&#8217;re pretty eager to hear how they plan to provide enough people time to resource it. Who will be doing the actual work, and how will it fit into their job? I do hear too many saying that they&#8217;ll just &#8216;add it onto&#8217; someone&#8217;s existing role &#8211; and it&#8217;s a bit of a red flag.</p>
<p>The cost of online technology has come crashing down in recent years &#8211; but the requirement to provide some real human time paying attention to online activity has increased. Rather than just see this as an opportunity to save money from the technology budget, companies should be re-investing those savings in human time to pay for all the work that is actually involved in running a successful online presence.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s great the brands are now able to run their own online media presence, but it takes time and human effort &#8211; and that is what generates the value &#8211; people. So if your thinking of investing in this space, think in terms of time, rather than money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nativehq.com/index.php/2010/02/the-invisible-workload-of-social-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Organising an event? Record and share it</title>
		<link>http://nativehq.com/index.php/2009/11/organising-an-event-record-and-share-it/</link>
		<comments>http://nativehq.com/index.php/2009/11/organising-an-event-record-and-share-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 03:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carl Morris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recording]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soundcloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vimeo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nativehq.com/?p=442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I met a representative of an arts organisation this week. She mentioned one of their key aims is to help artists and other people they deal with to share knowledge. So they are organising an event, a get-together, to allow people who wouldn&#8217;t normally meet to do so.
The event itself sounded like a good move. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I met a representative of an arts organisation this week. She mentioned one of their key aims is to help artists and other people they deal with to share knowledge. So they are organising an event, a get-together, to allow people who wouldn&#8217;t normally meet to do so.</p>
<p>The event itself sounded like a good move. It also made me think of the possible benefits of recording the event and uploading it online.</p>
<p>The recording might be a video, on a service such as <a href="http://www.youtube.com/">YouTube</a> or <a href="http://vimeo.com/">Vimeo</a>. Or it might be just the audio, on a service such as <a href="http://soundcloud.com/">Soundcloud</a>. Attendees and other people can then embed a player on their blogs and websites, if you allow this (and usually there&#8217;s no reason not to allow embedding). Ideally you could embed it on your organisation or company website &#8211; but you don&#8217;t even need to do that to get started, at least for now.</p>
<p>The equipment for just documenting something is so ridiculously cheap now. We&#8217;re not talking about high production values or live streaming, just documenting the thing.</p>
<p>(There plenty of other ways to document an event using social media but today I&#8217;ll focus on getting the whole event as audio or video.)</p>
<p>Most attendees can be fine with audio or video if you tell them beforehand. Let them know about good opportunities to introduce themselves and plug their own work &#8211; at the start of each person&#8217;s first comment for example.</p>
<p>For video we use the <a href="http://www.theflip.com/">Flip cam</a> at Native, which is just a suggestion but it is cheap and an additional bonus is its size. It&#8217;s portable and so small that even the less confident people can happily ignore it and get on with sharing their thoughts.</p>
<p>So here are some possible benefits.</p>
<p><strong>Extending the reach</strong><br />
There will probably be people who want to attend your event but can&#8217;t, because of time and geography. Recording it allows them to catch up afterwards.</p>
<p><strong>Reminders</strong><br />
For people who do attend your event it serves as a reminder of what was discussed. It might even help them to concentrate and fully participate in the meeting rather than struggle to take notes of everything.</p>
<p><strong>Awareness of your organisation</strong><br />
Publishing a recording helps wider awareness of your organisation, its aims, its projects and so on. Relevant recordings lead to inbound links and boost to your online reputation.</p>
<p><strong>Openness</strong><br />
One feature of the web, thought by many to be the beauty of the web, is that your recording is potentially accessible to anyone. What about exclusivity? Some audio and video services do allow you to control access to recordings. But in most situations you can just make it open. Why place limits on who can get this information? It might seem paradoxical, but some of the most competitive people and companies are the ones sharing the most useful recordings. Most things aren&#8217;t sensitive. They may as well be open.</p>
<p><strong>Promotion of the event itself</strong><br />
This follows from the previous point. There are lots of reasons to attend your event. Some of these reasons are: meeting other attendees face-to-face, asking questions, having more influence, helping oneself to a drink or buffet. None of these are replaced by a recording. Often the recording can promote the event. (For instance, look at how the prestigious <a href="http://www.ted.com">TED</a> talks have taken off since they started sharing video. The attendance fee has increased too.)</p>
<p><strong>Persistence</strong><br />
Having a recording of key points may allow you to avoid having to repeat yourself. You can keep the recording online for weeks, months, even years afterwards. All of the good audio and video services will give your recording a permalink. This will not change and can thus be emailed to your community and shared between them and other people. Your recording will also be found by people searching for keywords contained in its title or list of tags.</p>
<p><strong>Unknown reasons</strong><br />
I kick myself to think of the useful events I&#8217;ve attended &#8211; or even organised &#8211; and not had recorded. That&#8217;s because you don&#8217;t always know how useful the recording will be until afterwards. Or maybe sometime later. Those meetings just vanished into thin air. I&#8217;ll get by, but it would have taken hardly any effort to record them &#8211; so why not? (I&#8217;ve also been to some boring and irrelevant meetings in my time, but that&#8217;s subjective. Even those might have been of use to someone out there. You never know.)</p>
<p>These benefits can apply to anything good you choose to put online, not just audio and video. You could substitute the word &#8220;recording&#8221; above with &#8220;blog post&#8221;. You might already have guessed that for me, typing out this blog post ticks off some of the benefits described above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nativehq.com/index.php/2009/11/organising-an-event-record-and-share-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
